ANALISIS PERSEPSI PENGGUNA TERHADAP APLIKASI QPON MENGGUNAKAN METODE KLASIFIKASI SVM DAN NAÏVE BAYES
Abstract
The quality, user experience, and reliability of the Qpon application greatly influence the importance of consumer perception. The variation of the text and its increasing number is difficult if manual analysis is carried out. Machine learning is an effective model for efficiently classifying perceptions. The goal is to analyze and compare the performance of the SVM and Naïve Bayes algorithms in classifying the perception of Qpon application users. This research method uses a quantitative approach with Machine Learning-based text analysis techniques to classify the perception of Qpon application users. Data was obtained from the Google Play Store using the scraping method with a scope of 1–31 October 2025. The main result of the total valid data is 631 reviews; the majority of users who give positive reviews are 52.8% (5 stars). After labeling, the distribution of positive perception was 56.49%, negative 39.24% and neutral 4.27%. The difference in algorithm comparison can be seen from slightly higher accuracy as well as more consistent predictions on negative and positive classes. So, SVM is more suitable for the classification of users of the Qpon application.
References
[2] P. Nayal and N. Pandey, “Digital coupon redemption: Conceptualization, scale development and validation,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 24, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2469.
[3] R. Bacik, B. Gavurova, R. Fedorko, and M. Olearova, “Using Digital Devices in the Online Shopping: a Study of Demographic Differences,” Marketing and Management of Innovations, no. 4, pp. 154–167, 2020, doi: 10.21272/mmi.2020.4-12.
[4] Yuanguang Zhong, Xinhong Jiang, Xiong Zhang, Jie Min, and T. C. Edwin Cheng, “Newsvendor Model with Voucher Sales: A Distributionally Robust Approach,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 2, Feb. 2023.
[5] Y. Akman and H. G. Turkmen, “A Study On Customer Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Digital Coupons,” Journal of Business, Innovation and Governance, vol. 4(2), 2021, doi: doi.org/10.54472/jobig.1034612.
[6] Shofianti, “Dampak E-Commerce Terhadap Perubahan Kebiasaan Belanja Masyarakat di Indonesia,” Jakarta, 2021.
[7] D. M. Immanuel and C. N. Mustikarini, “Price Perception: Effect of Coupon Proneness and Sale Proneness on Consumer Impulse Buying,” Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, doi: 10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.
[8] A. Suryani, A. Rahayu, and P. D. Dirgantari, “Measuring The Impact of Hedonic Motivation, Smart Shopper Perception, Location-Based Coupon Attitude on Intention of Use Location-Based Coupon,” Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, vol. 4(3), 2024, doi: 10.31933/dijms.v4i3.
[9] M. Sunjaya, Z. Sitorus, M. Iqbal, and A. P. U. Siahaan, “Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches to Determine Online Shopping Ratings Using Naïve Bayes and SVM,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, May 2024, doi: 10.61306/ijecom.v3i1.60.
[10] M. B. Anggara, “Perbandingan Naïve Bayes Dan Svm Dalam Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Aplikasi Rsud Al Ihsan Mobile,” Jurnal Competitive, vol. 20, no. 1, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.36618/competitive.v20i1.4213.
[11] H. Hariyadi, D. Firdo, and M. H. Al Rafi, “Implementasi Algoritma Naïve Bayes dan Support Vector Machine pada Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Aplikasi Canva,” Jurnal Minfo Polgan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 261–269, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.33395/jmp.v13i1.13568.
[12] Y. M. Alghifari, M. R. Sanjaya, E. L. Ruskan, and D. R. Indah, “Comparison Of Svm And Naive Bayes Algorithms In Sentiment Analysis Of User Reviews On Bukalapak Perbandingan Algoritma Svm Dan Naive Bayes Dalam Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Ulasan Pengguna Bukalapak,” Jurnal INOVTEK POLBENG - Seri Informatika, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1623–1633, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.35314/dqhpkb12.
[13] L. B. Ilmawan and M. A. Mude, “Perbandingan Metode Klasifikasi Support Vector Machine dan Naïve Bayes untuk Analisis Sentimen pada Ulasan Tekstual di Google Play Store,” ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 154–161, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v12i2.597.154-161.
[14] S. Hassan, M. Rafi, and M. Shahid Shaikh, “Comparing SVM and Naïve Bayes Classifiers for Text Categorization with Wikitology as knowledge enrichment.”
[15] Z. Liu, G. Song, J. Cai, T.-J. Cham, and J. Zhang, “Conditional Adversarial Synthesis of 3D Facial Action Units,” Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.05.003.
[16] C. Cortes, V. Vapnik, and L. Saitta, “Support-Vector Networks Editor,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
[17] A. Mccallum and K. Nigam, “A Comparison of Event Models for Naive Bayes Text Classiication.”
[18] A. A. A. Witaradiani, I. G. A. Wibawa and P. P. Santika, "Klasifikasi Genre Buku Berdasarkan Sinopsis Menggunakan Naïve Bayes dan Logistic Regression," JNATIA : Jurnal Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Aplikasinya, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 839, 2025. [1] A. A. A. Witaradiani, I. G. A. Wibawa and P. P. Santika, "Klasifikasi Genre Buku Berdasarkan Sinopsis Menggunakan Naïve Bayes dan Logistic Regression," JNATIA : Jurnal Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Aplikasinya, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 839, 2025.
[19] N. A. D. Istanto and . B. S. W. Poetro, "Implementasi Algoritma Faster R-CNN dalam Deteksi Aktivitas Merkokok di Lingkungan Kampus," JRSIT, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 49, 2025.
[20] Rofik and Jumanto, "Evaluation of Ridge Classifier and Logistic Regression for Customer Churn Prediction on Imbalanced Telecommunication Data," Scientific Journal of Informatics, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 317, 2025.
[21] R. M. Alzoman and M. J. F. Alenazi, “A Comparative Study of Traffic Classification Techniques for Smart City Networks,” Jurnal Sensors, vol. 21, no. 14, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21144677.





